CRASH: tool pc-rel instru mangled by DR can be mistaken as clean call instru and mis-translated

We are seeing crashes when using drbbdup on x86 on detach. The drbbdup state restore function seems perfectly correct: it is DR that is messing things up. We finally tracked it down to DR thinking that drbbdup's case load instructions are in fact a clean call setup. DR then tries to restore the context from the dstack and gets incorrect values.

This is with drmemtrace where the drbbdup case operand is a pc-relative load. DR has a feature where it will mangle tool-inserted pc-relative references into two-part sequences if they won't reach in their code cache destination. Thus we end up with something like this (this is with no tool instrumentation aside from drbbdup, so we just have 2 copies of this simple cmp;jnz app block) where diagnostics are marking 3 instrs considered "our_mangling":

 +0    m4 @0x00007f6b07b75f70  65 48 89 3c 25 20 01 mov    %rdi -> %gs:0x00000120[8byte]
                               00 00
 +9    m4MANGLING @0x00007f6b0b183178  48 bf 88 34 35 6d 17 mov    $0x000056176d353488 -> %rdi
                               56 00 00
 +19   m4MANGLING @0x00007f6b0b1832c8  48 8b 3f             mov    (%rdi)[8byte] -> %rdi
 +22   m4 @0x00007f6b07b75d90                       <label note=0x000000000000004e>
 +22   m4 @0x00007f6b0b183260  e9 49 00 00 00       jmp    @0x00007f6b0b1830a8[8byte]
 +27   m4 @0x00007f6b0b183040  65 48 8b 3c 25 20 01 mov    %gs:0x00000120[8byte] -> %rdi
                               00 00
 +36   L3 @0x00007f6b07b75ec8  80 7d bc 00          cmp    0xffffffbc(%rbp)[1byte] $0x00
 +40   m4 @0x00007f6b0b183348                       <label note=0x0000000000000001>
 +40   m4 @0x00007f6b07b75c40  e9 4a 00 00 00       jmp    @0x00007f6b07b75cc0[8byte]
 +45   m4 @0x00007f6b07b75d28                       <label note=0x0000000000000002>
 +45   m4 @0x00007f6b0b1830a8                       <label note=0x000000000000004e>
 +45   m4 @0x00007f6b0b1831e0  65 48 8b 3c 25 20 01 mov    %gs:0x00000120[8byte] -> %rdi
                               00 00
 +54   L3 @0x00007f6b0b1833c8  80 7d bc 00          cmp    0xffffffbc(%rbp)[1byte] $0x00
 +58   m4 @0x00007f6b07b75e60                       <label note=0x0000000000000001>
 +58   m4 @0x00007f6b07b75cc0                       <label note=0x000000000000004f>
 +58   m4 @0x00007f6b07b75df8                       <label note=0x0000000000000002>
 +58   L4 @0x00007f6b07b75b98  0f 85 62 53 e2 09    jnz    $0x000056176cab2268
 +64   L4MANGLING @0x00007f6b0b183430  e9 f2 52 e2 09       jmp    $0x000056176cab21f7

The first 2 of those are the 2-part case load.

The current translation code has no precise way to identify clean calls and instead it identifies everything else and says that anything in "our_mangling" with no translation must then be a clean call. But DR mangling tool code breaks this assumption.

We do not want to not mark DR-mangled tool code as not our_mangling as there can be spills and restores in there and we want DR to properly restore those.

We need to either precisely identify mangle_rel_addr() sequences, or precisely identify clean call sequences. Both are complex. Since the pc-rel doesn't need any action beyond regular spill tracking, it seems better to identify clean calls. There are plenty of bits in translation_info_t, but not in instr_t: so I'm thinking of using labels for the instrlist case, and flags for the stored-info case.