adox/adcx decode table entries are wrong?

Created by: khuey

#2615 (closed) added adox/adcx support. Both instructions take two operands and store to the first operand. Since the first operand is both a source and a destination, shouldn't the table entries be

    {OP_adox,      0xf338f618, "adox",    Gy, xx, Gy, Ey, xx, mrm, (fWO|fRO), END_LIST},
    {OP_adcx,      0x6638f618, "adcx",    Gy, xx, Gy, Ey, xx, mrm, (fWC|fRC), END_LIST},

rather than what's there today

    {OP_adox,      0xf338f618, "adox",    Gy, xx, Ey, xx, xx, mrm, (fWO|fRO), END_LIST},
    {OP_adcx,      0x6638f618, "adcx",    Gy, xx, Ey, xx, xx, mrm, (fWC|fRC), END_LIST},

?